From today's Los Angeles Times
Gun-rights advocates and some permit holders say the review of concealed weapons permits violates the 2nd Amendment. Sheriff Sandra Hutchens is surprised by the reaction.
By Stuart Pfeifer
November 12, 2008
In her first five months in office, newly appointed Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens has brought in a new management team, fired deputies accused of misconduct and tried to distance the department from the legacy of her indicted predecessor, Michael S. Carona.
But the most controversy she has generated has been her decision to review the concealed weapons permits issued by Carona.
Hutchens said she was concerned that more than 1,100 people held concealed carry permits issued by the former sheriff -- nearly three times the number of permits issued in Los Angeles County. She assigned a lieutenant to review each concealed weapons permit to determine whether the holder had a valid reason for carrying a weapon in public and whether these were people whose safety was at risk.
Board of Supervisors Chairman John Moorlach sent a message to county residents about the issue. It said:
We have been working behind the scenes to assist our new Sheriff in clarifying her definition of “good cause” for issuing a CCW permit (carrying a concealed weapon). As Mario was and still is a law professor (he lectures one morning each week), he has an excellent understanding of the State’s Constitution and its interpretations.
Supervisor Norby wants to accomplish the same goal, but it looks like using what clearly appears to be an unconstitutional resolution is his preferred method of choice. I hope our session provides for good dialog, a clear understanding of our roles, and a respect for them.
I felt that Sheriff Hutchens had a better CCW policy than the other finalist for the position. She informed the Board last month that she has issued 54 new CCWs, so she is not eliminating this opportunity. But, based on what’s coming out in the Carona trial, she has every right to be concerned about current CCW holders and reassuring the department that they have “good cause” for continuing their issuance to them.
I understand a Supervisor having concerns with an elected official. I certainly made my concerns public and agendized a matter last year with another elected official. My fear, however, is that the Board meeting may be counter-productive. Some people do tighten up when pressured to do something. Let’s hope I’m wrong.